Keeping Linux with GPL 2 means the project won't be able to take advantage of some changes. And some experts believe GPL 3 is better. "I think it's a definite improvement.

To summarize, the GPL licensing of Linux is seldom a problem for embedded applications. In most cases, your core technology is either in the hardware or in the application-level software ...

Some coders believe the Linux kernel won't use version 3 of the GPL, but Alan Cox wants developers to stop speculating at this early stage. X. Trending. Memorial Day tech sales 2025 ...

The Linux leader is still skeptical about GPL 3, but open-source Solaris could be a draw. X. Your Guide To a Better Future. News AI Tech ...

Like it or lump it, Linux and the GPL go together like ducks and water, and the Free Software Foundation is there to make sure it stays that way.

Because of this the GPL has come under fire. In 2001 then-CEO of Microsoft Stever Ballmer came out against Linux because of its use of the GPL.

If what ComputerWorld is reporting and this blog post is saying, Microsoft may have effectively GPL’d the Linux Hyper-V drivers, whether intentional or not.If you link your code to GPL licensed ...

Microsoft released set of Linux drivers for its Hyper-V software under the GPLv2 (General Public License version 2) not because of “perceived obligations” to that license but because it is the ...

The Linux kernel is licensed under the GPL. The drivers Microsoft released, once added to the Linux kernel, will provide the hooks for any distribution of Linux to run on Windows Server 2008 and ...

The Linux operating system will remain under Version 2 of the General Public License rather than migrate to GPLv3, according to the kernel's creator.